I did not see a study to which I would have given a prize, at least not in a normal tournament. But in a weaker tournament, it is possible to lower the standards, of course. I can follow Martin’s relative ranking of the studies.
Pity for the rude introduction in Avni’s study: three checks and three consecutive captures. If the author had found a better way to introduce the double strike Rg2!! and Rh6+!!, it would have been a clear prize candidate (for me).
I did not see a study to which I would have given a prize, at least not in a normal tournament. But in a weaker tournament, it is possible to lower the standards, of course. I can follow Martin’s relative ranking of the studies.
Pity for the rude introduction in Avni’s study: three checks and three consecutive captures. If the author had found a better way to introduce the double strike Rg2!! and Rh6+!!, it would have been a clear prize candidate (for me).