Russian page  |
Harold van der Heijden: «Apart from other artistic merits (e.g. a theme / idea), in my view a good endgame study needs a surprise, or something that makes us smile». |
 |
Peter Gyarmati: «I like tactical studies». «The work should be solvable by human». |
 |
Steffen Slumstrup Nielsen: «Precision and economy does not make a study. Showing the complexity of chess is not the job of study composers». |
 |
Martin Minski: «I don’t like computer studies with too many analytic variations». |
 |
Arpad Rusz: «I really dislike when someone inflates the solution with dualistic variations and tries. The real solution should tell the story alone and for analytical variations we have the computer». |